enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: high task relationship leadership style

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Task-oriented and relationship-oriented leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Task-oriented_and...

    The research concluded that there is no single "best" style of leadership, and thus led to the creation of the situational leadership theory, which essentially argues that leaders should engage in a healthy dose of both task-oriented and relationship-oriented leadership fit for the situation, and the people being led.

  3. Situational leadership theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situational_leadership_theory

    Hersey and Blanchard characterized leadership style in terms of the amount of task behavior and relationship behavior that the leader provides to their followers. They categorized all leadership styles into four behavior styles based on combinations of either high or low task behavior and relationship behavior, which they named S1 to S4.

  4. Fiedler contingency model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiedler_contingency_model

    A high LPC score suggests that the leader has a "human relations orientation", while a low LPC score indicates a "task orientation". Fiedler assumes that everybody's least preferred coworker in fact is on average about equally unpleasant, but people who are relationship-motivated tend to describe their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner, e.g., more pleasant and more efficient.

  5. History of contingency theories of leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Contingency...

    Leadership behavior was modeled as a continuum between Fiedler defined styles as either task motivated or relationship motivated and developed a scale to classify leaders into one of these styles. He considered the state of the relationships in the workplace, the degree of structure in the task, and strength of the positional power of the ...

  6. Leadership style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_style

    This leadership style has been associated with lower productivity than both autocratic and democratic styles of leadership and with lower group member satisfaction than democratic leadership. [9] Some researchers have suggested that laissez-faire leadership can actually be considered non-leadership or leadership avoidance. [18]

  7. Michigan Studies of Leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Studies_of_Leadership

    They also identified three critical characteristics of effective leaders – task-oriented behavior, relationship-oriented behavior and participative leadership. [2] The studies concluded that an employee orientation rather than a production orientation, coupled with general instead of close supervision, led to better results.

  8. Contingency theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingency_theory

    A high score indicates the test taker is relational in style and a low score indicates the test taker is more task orientated in style. Situational favorable-ness was described by Fiedler in terms of three empirically derived dimensions: Leader-member relationshiphigh if the leader is generally accepted and respected by followers

  9. Leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership

    According to Fiedler, there is no ideal leader. Both task-oriented and relationship-oriented leaders can be effective if their leadership orientation fits the situation. When there is a good leader-member relation, a highly structured task, and high leader position power, the situation is considered a "favorable situation".

  1. Ads

    related to: high task relationship leadership style