Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Logical equivalence, where two statements are logically equivalent if they have the same logical content; Material equivalence, a relationship where the truth of either one of the connected statements requires the truth of the other
The equality equivalence relation is the finest equivalence relation on any set, while the universal relation, which relates all pairs of elements, is the coarsest. The relation " ∼ {\displaystyle \sim } is finer than ≈ {\displaystyle \approx } " on the collection of all equivalence relations on a fixed set is itself a partial order ...
The definition of equivalence relations implies that the equivalence classes form a partition of , meaning, that every element of the set belongs to exactly one equivalence class. The set of the equivalence classes is sometimes called the quotient set or the quotient space of S {\displaystyle S} by ∼ , {\displaystyle \,\sim \,,} and is ...
Logical equivalence is different from material equivalence. Formulas p {\displaystyle p} and q {\displaystyle q} are logically equivalent if and only if the statement of their material equivalence ( p ↔ q {\displaystyle p\leftrightarrow q} ) is a tautology.
As a rule of thumb, an equivalence of categories preserves all "categorical" concepts and properties. If F : C → D is an equivalence, then the following statements are all true: the object c of C is an initial object (or terminal object, or zero object), if and only if Fc is an initial object (or terminal object, or zero object) of D
material biconditional (material equivalence) if and only if, iff, xnor propositional logic, Boolean algebra: is true only if both A and B are false, or both A and B are true. Whether a symbol means a material biconditional or a logical equivalence, depends on the author’s style.
The connective is biconditional (a statement of material equivalence), [2] and can be likened to the standard material conditional ("only if", equal to "if ... then") combined with its reverse ("if"); hence the name. The result is that the truth of either one of the connected statements requires the truth of the other (i.e. either both ...
Mass–energy equivalence arose from special relativity as a paradox described by the French polymath Henri Poincaré (1854–1912). [4] Einstein was the first to propose the equivalence of mass and energy as a general principle and a consequence of the symmetries of space and time.