Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The boolean values True and False were added to the language in Python 2.2.1 as constants (subclassed from 1 and 0) and were changed to be full blown keywords in Python 3. The binary comparison operators such as == and > return either True or False.
[51] [52] While Python 2.7 and older versions are officially unsupported, a different unofficial Python implementation, PyPy, continues to support Python 2, i.e. "2.7.18+" (plus 3.10), with the plus meaning (at least some) "backported security updates". [53] Python 3.0 was released on 3 December 2008, with some new semantics and changed syntax.
Further, regarding the long-term plans, and as the project missed the Python 2.7 release, a Python Enhancement Proposal (PEP) [8] was accepted, which proposed a merge of Unladen Swallow into a special py3k-jit branch of Python's official repository. As of July 2010, this work was ongoing. [17]
In computing, a persistent data structure or not ephemeral data structure is a data structure that always preserves the previous version of itself when it is modified. Such data structures are effectively immutable, as their operations do not (visibly) update the structure in-place, but instead always yield a new updated structure. The term was ...
The necessary distinction can be made by first partitioning the edges; i.e., defining the binary tree as triplet (V, E 1, E 2), where (V, E 1 ∪ E 2) is a rooted tree (equivalently arborescence) and E 1 ∩ E 2 is empty, and also requiring that for all j ∈ { 1, 2 }, every node has at most one E j child. [14]
1. all-butter pie crust. 1 1/2 c. all-purpose flour, plus more for dusting. 2/3 c. packed light brown sugar. 1/2 tsp. ground cinnamon. 1/4 tsp. kosher salt. 6 tbsp. salted butter, very cold and ...
for X := 0.1 step 0.1 to 1.0 do might be repeated 9 or 10 times, depending on rounding errors and/or the hardware and/or the compiler version. Furthermore, if the increment of X occurs by repeated addition, accumulated rounding errors may mean that the value of X in each iteration can differ quite significantly from the expected sequence 0.1, 0 ...
y := 1 y := 2 x := y Humans can see that the first assignment is not necessary, and that the value of y being used in the third line comes from the second assignment of y. A program would have to perform reaching definition analysis to determine this. But if the program is in SSA form, both of these are immediate: y 1 := 1 y 2 := 2 x 1 := y 2