enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Law of excluded middle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_excluded_middle

    In logic, the law of excluded middle or the principle of excluded middle states that for every proposition, either this proposition or its negation is true. [1] [2] It is one of the three laws of thought, along with the law of noncontradiction, and the law of identity; however, no system of logic is built on just these laws, and none of these laws provides inference rules, such as modus ponens ...

  3. Competitive exclusion principle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Competitive_exclusion_principle

    The best-known example is the so-called "paradox of the plankton". [6] All plankton species live on a very limited number of resources, primarily solar energy and minerals dissolved in the water. According to the competitive exclusion principle, only a small number of plankton species should be able to coexist on these resources.

  4. Second-order logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-order_logic

    For example, if the domain is the set of all real numbers, one can assert in first-order logic the existence of an additive inverse of each real number by writing ∀x ∃y (x + y = 0) but one needs second-order logic to assert the least-upper-bound property for sets of real numbers, which states that every bounded, nonempty set of real numbers ...

  5. Peirce's law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peirce's_law

    With that understanding, the formula states the principle of excluded middle, that from the falsity of the denial of x follows the truth of x. (Peirce, the Collected Papers 3.384). Warning : As explained in the text, " a " here does not denote a propositional atom, but something like the quantified propositional formula ∀ p p {\displaystyle ...

  6. Proof by contradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_contradiction

    By the law of excluded middle P either holds or it does not: if P holds, then of course P holds. if ¬P holds, then we derive falsehood by applying the law of noncontradiction to ¬P and ¬¬P, after which the principle of explosion allows us to conclude P. In either case, we established P. It turns out that, conversely, proof by contradiction ...

  7. L. E. J. Brouwer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._E._J._Brouwer

    With two Addenda and corrigenda, 334-45. Brouwer gives brief synopsis of his belief that the law of excluded middle cannot be "applied without reservation even in the mathematics of infinite systems" and gives two examples of failures to illustrate his assertion. 1925. A. N. Kolmogorov: "On the principle of excluded middle", pp. 414–437 ...

  8. Intuitionistic logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic

    Taking the principle of excluded middle from the mathematician would be the same, say, as proscribing the telescope to the astronomer or to the boxer the use of his fists. To prohibit existence statements and the principle of excluded middle is tantamount to relinquishing the science of mathematics altogether.

  9. Principle of explosion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

    In classical logic, intuitionistic logic, and similar logical systems, the principle of explosion [a] [b] is the law according to which any statement can be proven from a contradiction. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] That is, from a contradiction, any proposition (including its negation ) can be inferred; this is known as deductive explosion .