enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Textual entailment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_entailment

    Textual entailment measures natural language understanding as it asks for a semantic interpretation of the text, and due to its generality remains an active area of research. Many approaches and refinements of approaches have been considered, such as word embedding , logical models, graphical models, rule systems, contextual focusing, and ...

  3. Law of noncontradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction

    In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC; also known as the law of contradiction, principle of non-contradiction (PNC), or the principle of contradiction) states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "the house is white" and "the house is not white" are mutually exclusive.

  4. Entailment (linguistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entailment_(linguistics)

    Linguistic entailments are entailments which arise in natural language.If a sentence A entails a sentence B, sentence A cannot be true without B being true as well. [1] For instance, the English sentence "Pat is a fluffy cat" entails the sentence "Pat is a cat" since one cannot be a fluffy cat without being a cat.

  5. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    The Polish logician Alfred Tarski identified three features of an adequate characterization of entailment: (1) The logical consequence relation relies on the logical form of the sentences: (2) The relation is a priori, i.e., it can be determined with or without regard to empirical evidence (sense experience); and (3) The logical consequence ...

  6. Law of thought - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_thought

    The expressions "law of non-contradiction" and "law of excluded middle" are also used for semantic principles of model theory concerning sentences and interpretations: (NC) under no interpretation is a given sentence both true and false, (EM) under any interpretation, a given sentence is either true or false.

  7. Principle of explosion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

    Law of noncontradiction – no proposition can be both true and not true; Paraconsistent logic – a family of logics used to address contradictions; Paradox of entailment – a seeming paradox derived from the principle of explosion; Reductio ad absurdum – concluding that a proposition is false because it produces a contradiction

  8. Proof by contradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_contradiction

    Formally the law of non-contradiction is written as ¬(P ∧ ¬P) and read as "it is not the case that a proposition is both true and false". The law of non-contradiction neither follows nor is implied by the principle of Proof by contradiction. The laws of excluded middle and non-contradiction together mean that exactly one of P and ¬P is true.

  9. Paradoxes of material implication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_material...

    In natural language, an instance of the paradox of entailment arises: It is raining. And It is not raining. Therefore George Washington is made of rakes. This arises from the principle of explosion, a law of classical logic stating that inconsistent premises always make an argument valid; that is, inconsistent premises imply any conclusion at all.