enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criticisms of globalization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_globalization

    In the process of implementing globalization in developing countries, the selection of winners and losers is often predetermined. Multinational corporations often benefit from globalization, while poor indigenous locals are negatively affected and often exploited.

  3. Every Nation for Itself - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Every_Nation_for_Itself

    Every Nation for Itself: Winners and Losers in a G-Zero World is a 2012 non-fiction book by Ian Bremmer that explains the growing "G-Zero" power vacuum in international politics as no country or group of countries has the political and economic leverage to drive an international agenda or provide global public goods.

  4. Globalization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization

    Globalization is the process of increasing interdependence and integration among the economies, markets, societies, ... Though it creates winners and losers, the ...

  5. Trump’s tariffs from his first term increased consumer prices in the furniture and kitchen cabinet sector by 7.1 percent, the corner of the economy that saw the biggest surge in prices ...

  6. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Economic nationalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_nationalism

    Globalization, like the type one can observe in the European Union, is easy to oppose as it creates winners and losers. Those who lose their jobs due to globalization are more likely to be drawn to parties espousing economic nationalism. [25]

  8. The Fed's new game plan: Here are the biggest winners and ...

    www.aol.com/finance/fed-rate-winners-losers...

    The Fed's new game plan: Here are the biggest winners and losers of January's pause and anticipated 2025 cuts. Yahia Barakah. Updated January 29, 2025 at 11:21 AM.

  9. China shock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_shock

    A 2023 review of existing economic research concluded that US-China trade since the early 2000s caused aggregate welfare gains in both countries; had winners and losers in the US; and was not a leading cause of manufacturing employment decline in the US. [12] Experts have argued that the China trade shock has ended.