enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. UK's tougher immigration policy risks trapping victims in ...

    www.aol.com/news/uks-tougher-immigration-policy...

    The law strengthened the National Referral Mechanism (NRM), the UK's system for identifying and protecting victims created in 2009 in accordance with an international anti-trafficking treaty ...

  3. R v Mann - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Mann

    R v Mann is a 2004 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada.. The court held that although there is no general power of detention for investigative purposes, police officers may detain an individual if there are reasonable grounds to suspect in all the circumstances that the individual is connected to a particular crime and that the detention is reasonably necessary on an objective view of the ...

  4. Reasonable and probable grounds in Australia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_probable...

    The Canadian system of police powers on reasonable and probable grounds is more clearly defined; a tip from an informer reporting a crime is insufficient to establish reasonable and probable grounds. [36] In Australia it depends on the circumstances of the case, rather than on the reasonable and probable grounds itself. [4]

  5. Adequate and independent state ground - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adequate_and_independent...

    The adequate and independent state ground doctrine states that when a litigant petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to review the judgment of a state court which rests upon both federal and non-federal (state) law, the U.S. Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over the case if the state ground is (1) “adequate” to support the judgment, and ...

  6. Howard Marine and Dredging Co Ltd v A Ogden & Sons ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Marine_and_Dredging...

    Howard Marine and Dredging Co Ltd v A Ogden & Sons (Excavations) Ltd [1978] QB 574 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It explains the test of "reasonable grounds for belief" under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 s 2(1), and raises the issue of the reasonableness test under s 3.

  7. United States v. Mendenhall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_V._Mendenhall

    The decision notably set a standard by which a valid consensual stop could be converted into an unconstitutional Terry stop, such as by "the threatening presence of several officers, the display of a weapon by an officer, some physical touching of the person of the citizen, or the use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with ...

  8. Brinegar v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brinegar_v._United_States

    Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case employing the "reasonableness test" in warrantless searches.The Court held that while the police need not always be factually correct in conducting a warrantless search, such a search must always be reasonable.

  9. The Latest | UN report says there's credible evidence of ...

    www.aol.com/news/latest-israeli-cabinet-member...

    There are also “reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may be ongoing,” said Pramila Patten, who visited Israel and the West Bank from Jan. 29 to Feb. 14 with a nine-member team.