Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Robocopy is a command-line file transfer utility for Microsoft Windows.Robocopy is functionally more comprehensive than the COPY command and XCOPY, but replaces neither.. Created by Kevin Allen [2] and first released as part of the Windows NT 4.0 Resource Kit, it has been a standard feature of Windows since Windows Vista and Windows Serv
Saw that "test\TESTFI~1" did not exist in the destination as a long file name and copied it as a new file. Robocopy was unaware of that when it opened "test\TESTFI~1" that Windows matched that with the short name for "test\test file". Robocopy overwrote the contents of "test\test file" and updated its date/time stamp to match that of TESTFI~1.
Disk cloning software facilitates a disk cloning operation by using software techniques to copy data from a source to a destination drive or to a disk image. List [ edit ]
It is multi-threaded, which permits it under some circumstances to copy files faster than some other copiers available for the Windows operating system. It provides a complete graphical user interface (GUI), whereas Microsoft's multi-threaded Robocopy is a command-line utility, [2] although there are GUI interfaces for it.
With this switch, if the destination computer supports SMB compression and the files being copied are very compressible, there may be significant improvements to performance. The SMB compression adds inline whitespace compression to file transfers. Compression is also available with the robocopy command and Hyper-V Live Migration with SMB. [12 ...
Commonly done by calculating and storing hash function digests of files to detect if two files with different names, edit dates, etc., have identical contents. Programs which do not support it, will behave as if the originally-named file/directory has been deleted and the newly named file/directory is new and transmit the "new" file again.
A forward incremental-forever backup [10] allows the synthetic operation to create a new full backup, which is limited to the size of the incremental file, instead of the complete size of a full backup file as it would happen in a “forward mode with synthetic fulls”. The overall consumed I/O is the same as the reversed incremental, but ...
No new files would be copied, only existing files updated, if needed. Combine was similar to synchronize except that no files would be deleted between the pairs. If a file on one side is out-of-date it is renamed then the newer file copied, so both the updated copy and the older version are retained in that folder.