Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Depending on their primary domain being health or ICT, the individual components of the AI for Health Framework were ratified by the corresponding United Nations Specialized Agency, as WHO Guidelines and ITU Recommendations respectively. Standards drawn up by FG-AI4H are titled as: AI4H ethics considerations
This is the AI HLEG's second deliverable, after the April 2019 publication of the "Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI". The June AI HLEG recommendations cover four principal subjects: humans and society at large, research and academia, the private sector, and the public sector. [78]
AI for Good has supported Global Initiatives on AI and Data Commons, [4] AI for Health [5] (in partnership with WHO), on Resilience to Natural Hazards through AI Solutions [6] (former ITU/WMO/UNEP Focus Group on Artificial Intelligence for Natural Disaster Management (FG-AI4NDM) [7]), AI and Multimedia authenticity standards collaboration [8] (under the World Standards Cooperation [9]), AI for ...
A report published Tuesday by UNESCO concludes that AI could result in false and misleading claims about the Holocaust spreading online, either because of flaws in the programs or because hate ...
(Reuters) -The White House on Tuesday proposed a non-binding Artificial Intelligence (AI) Bill of Rights that it said would help parents, patients and workers avert harm from the increasing use of ...
The OECD AI Principles [58] were adopted in May 2019, and the G20 AI Principles in June 2019. [55] [59] [60] In September 2019 the World Economic Forum issued ten 'AI Government Procurement Guidelines'. [61] In February 2020, the European Union published its draft strategy paper for promoting and regulating AI. [34]
UNESCO's report called on tech companies to establish ethical rules for the development and use of AI, to reduce the chances of unreliable information and to prevent bad actors from harnessing their programs in order to encourage violence and to spread lies about the Holocaust. The report was published in partnership with the World Jewish Congress.
GPAI seeks to bridge the gap between theory and practice by supporting research and applied activities in areas that are directly relevant to policymakers in the realm of AI. [3] It brings together experts from industry, civil society, governments, and academia to collaborate on the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence.