Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ryan v The Queen (abbreviated to Ryan v R) is a seminal case in Australian criminal law. The case is an application to the High Court of Australia for special leave to appeal a conviction for murder. It is often cited in cases of felony murder (referred to as constructive murder in Australian law) and when the issue of voluntariness is in question.
It was ruled that the jury had been entitled to conclude that the entry had been effective. Furthermore, in R v Ryan (1996) 160 JP 610, the defendant had been found partially within a building, having been trapped by a window, and argued that this was not a sufficient entry. However, he was convicted as it was held that a partial entry was ...
R v Ryan [2013] SCC 3 is a case concerning the availability of duress in the context of domestic violence. Background. Nicole Doucet Ryan (now Nicole Doucet) alleged ...
In 1995, Marvel Comics published a flipbook five issues mini-series entitled Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: Ninja Rangers/VR Troopers which featured the Power Rangers on one side and the VR Troopers on the other. In the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers issue 53, Ryan, Kaitlin and JB's names were mentioned as candidates for the Green Ranger.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
A Skug learns of the V.R. Troopers' plans to de-virtualize Ryan's father, Tyler Steele/Dark Heart and warns Grimlord. who decides to use Dark Heart as bait to lure Ryan to his destruction. Professor Hart and J.B. analyze the data and discovers that Dark Heart is literally connected to Grimlord through a specific chemical and electronic link.
Section 89(1) of the Police Act 1996 provides: . Any person who assaults a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting a constable in the execution of his duty, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.
R v R [1991] UKHL 12 is a House of Lords judgement in which R was convicted of attempting to rape his wife but appealed his conviction on the grounds of a marital rape exemption whereby R claimed a husband cannot be convicted of raping his wife as his wife had given consent to sexual intercourse through the contract of marriage which she could not withdraw.