Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Meanwhile, many in the quaint community of Traverse City are rallying behind Elijah, whose child welfare case has triggered an outpouring of support from people of all sorts: parents of childhood ...
She then cited an email Elijah's advocacy team received on Sept. 3 from the Department of Health and Human Services in Grand Traverse County where the boy lived with his adopted family for years.
It heard oral arguments on November 30, 2021. On June 15, 2022, the Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit in a 9–0 decision, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The court ruled that the statute does not give the Department of Health and Human Services the authority or the discretion to vary the reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals.
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974), was an equal protection case in the United States in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on whether unfavorable treatment to pregnant women could count as sex discrimination.
The cases indicated to be ongoing refer to Michigan Welfare Rights Org. et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al.; several cases filed against Trump and other defendants in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, variously brought by members of Congress, United States Capitol Police officers, and District of Columbia Metropolitan ...
Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly , 331 N.W.2d 203 (1982) is a US contract law case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan . It used a risk of loss analysis to justify the denial of rescission as a contract remedy despite the presence of mutual mistake.
The issue before the US Supreme Court involved how the states could determine how to implement a federal program. The court used the term "co-operative federalism." Shapiro v. Thompson, King v. Smith and Goldberg v. Kelly were a set of successful Supreme Court cases that dealt with Welfare, specifically referred to as a part of 'The Welfare ...
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that individuals have a statutorily granted property right in Social Security benefits, and the termination of such benefits implicates due process but does not require a pre-termination hearing.