Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Everybody should use Wikipedia, either as a source or, if you find deficiencies, as a medium you can make contributions. For comparison, see also Wikipedia: Why Wikipedia is not so great, and Wikipedia: Replies to common objections. You can then arrive at a well-informed conclusion thereafter.
See also why Wikipedia is so great. Learning to write in a neutral point of view is a useful intellectual exercise, since it requires cultivating humility and respect for the views of others. Wikipedia is a remarkable phenomenon of social organization; learning how things work here provides valuable lessons for many other kinds of organizations.
Wikipedia is "a major player in the internet landscape" [4] and "if you want to control “the truth”, you want to control Wikipedia." [5] "It is high time not only to acknowledge Wikipedia's quality but also to start actively promoting its use and development in academia" [6] Surveys tell us:
This argument goes thus: Search for any sensible topic on any search engine. Most of the time, Wikipedia or another Wikimedia project will be one of the top results. No other website reaches this level of omnipresence. The reason Wikipedia is so high on the list is because so many people use Wikipedia despite the warnings.
Wikipedia:Why was the page I created deleted? Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great; Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great; Wikipedia:Why I Hate Speedy Deleters; Wikipedia:Why to contribute; Wikipedia:Why do you care? Wikipedia:Why should I care? Wikipedia:Why secret pages should be deleted; Wikipedia:Why use Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Incentives
You may succeed in getting a borderline-notability article there for a short time. You may occupy a lot of editor time in repeatedly deleting it. But it won't last, and it will make it more difficult to get an article accepted if and when you do start to make it. So it's a very bad investment. So back to the guitar and the home studio.
Contribute what you know or are willing to learn about. One of the things that makes the Wikipedia great is that anybody can contribute, however this creates a problem to whether the information posted is true, but another thing that makes it great is that it encourages Wikipedians to stretch their interests and learn about new things, so that they can add to the 'pedia.
I ended up on Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great from following a link to Wikipedia:Wikipedia commentary/Wikipedia quality, from Wikipedia Quality Survey. This article is unencyclopedic, biased, cites no sources, offers no evidence to any one of its claims, and is, to say the least, masturbatory.