enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pumping lemma for regular languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_lemma_for_regular...

    The pumping lemma is often used to prove that a particular language is non-regular: a proof by contradiction may consist of exhibiting a string (of the required length) in the language that lacks the property outlined in the pumping lemma. Example: The language = {:} over the alphabet = {,} can be shown to be non-regular as follows:

  3. Pumping lemma for context-free languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_lemma_for_context...

    The pumping lemma for context-free languages (called just "the pumping lemma" for the rest of this article) describes a property that all context-free languages are guaranteed to have. The property is a property of all strings in the language that are of length at least p {\displaystyle p} , where p {\displaystyle p} is a constant—called the ...

  4. File:Pumping-Lemma xyz.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pumping-Lemma_xyz.pdf

    You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.

  5. Induction of regular languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_of_regular_languages

    Based on this relation, whose lack of transitivity [note 3] causes considerable technical problems, they give an O(n 4) [note 4] algorithm to construct from F a cover automaton A of minimal state count. Moreover, for union, intersection, and difference of two finite languages they provide corresponding operations on their cover automata.

  6. Context-free language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_language

    The set of all context-free languages is identical to the set of languages accepted by pushdown automata, which makes these languages amenable to parsing.Further, for a given CFG, there is a direct way to produce a pushdown automaton for the grammar (and thereby the corresponding language), though going the other way (producing a grammar given an automaton) is not as direct.

  7. Regular language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_language

    In theoretical computer science and formal language theory, a regular language (also called a rational language) [1] [2] is a formal language that can be defined by a regular expression, in the strict sense in theoretical computer science (as opposed to many modern regular expression engines, which are augmented with features that allow the recognition of non-regular languages).

  8. Chomsky normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_normal_form

    To convert a grammar to Chomsky normal form, a sequence of simple transformations is applied in a certain order; this is described in most textbooks on automata theory. [4]: 87–94 [5] [6] [7] The presentation here follows Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), but is adapted to use the transformation names from Lange, Leiß (2009).

  9. Pumping lemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_lemma

    Pumping lemma for context-free languages, the fact that all sufficiently long strings in such a language have a pair of substrings that can be repeated arbitrarily many times, usually used to prove that certain languages are not context-free; Pumping lemma for indexed languages; Pumping lemma for regular tree languages