Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court decision that found Medical University of South Carolina's policy regarding involuntary drug testing of pregnant women to violate the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the search in question was unreasonable. [1]
The law was a second attempt by Yee to enact restrictions for video game sales to minors. Yee's background as a child psychologist led him to assert there was a connection between video games and violence and believed that the government had strong interest in restricting video game sales to minors as was already done for pornographic works. [20]
The FRA also adopted regulations that authorized railroads to administer breath and urine drug tests to employees who violated safety rules. The Railway Labor Executives' Association , an umbrella group of railway trade unions , sued to have the regulations declared an unconstitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States ...
The case has been noted by GamesRadar+ as one of the lawsuits that altered the course of the game industry, allowing the rental market to thrive for the years that followed. [25] As the game industry came to accept video game rentals, companies turned their attention to the economic threat of used game sales. [27]
The excitement comes at the end of a tough year for the video game industry marked by potentially thousands of layoffs. One studio director compared the industry’s general atmosphere to a funeral.
The candidate could provide test specimen at a laboratory approved by the state or at the office of the candidate's personal physician. Once a urine sample was obtained, a state-approved laboratory determined whether any of the specified illegal drugs were present and prepared a certificate reporting the test results to the candidate.
Many of the same points of law that were litigated in this case have been argued in digital copyright cases, particularly peer-to-peer lawsuits; for example, in A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. in 2001, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a fair use "space shifting" argument raised as an analogy to the time-shifting argument that ...
The game studio developed Duke Nukem 3D under their new name 3D Realms, with support from software publisher FormGen. [2] Released in 1996, Duke Nukem 3D was acclaimed as one of the best video games of all time by PC Gamer. [3] The game also included a tool that allowed players to create their own levels using the game's graphics and gameplay. [4]