Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Criteria for evaluating reliability. The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by the following criteria: Vandalism of a Wikipedia article. The section on the left is the normal, undamaged version; and on the right is the vandalized, damaged version. Accuracy of information provided within articles.
For example, the COVID-19 pandemic was an important topic on which people relied on Wikipedia for genuine information. [5] Seeking public trust is a major part of Wikipedia's publication philosophy. [6] Various reader polls and studies have reported public trust in Wikipedia's process for quality control.
Spreading false information can also seriously impede the effective and efficient use of the information available on social media. [117] An emerging trend in the online information environment is "a shift away from public discourse to private, more ephemeral, messaging ", which is a challenge to counter misinformation.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia, or as a source for copying or translating content. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect. Biographies of living persons, subjects ...
False information in some articles, such as legal, medical or medication articles, could have serious real-world consequences. And making false, negative statements about a living person can expose Wikipedia to legal issues for defamation. Lying is also harmful to the online Wikipedia community which edits and develops the encyclopedia.
The term is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online; however, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 9 September 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...
If a Wikipedia article links to this page, it is due to an editor's concerns regarding the accuracy of statements within that article. Statements causing such concern are marked with the tags disputeddiscuss or dubiousdiscuss. An editor can insert such a warning by using the templates Disputed inline or Dubious.