enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Converse (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_(logic)

    Then the converse of S is the statement Q implies P (Q → P). In general, the truth of S says nothing about the truth of its converse, [2] unless the antecedent P and the consequent Q are logically equivalent. For example, consider the true statement "If I am a human, then I am mortal."

  3. Converse relation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_relation

    In the monoid of binary endorelations on a set (with the binary operation on relations being the composition of relations), the converse relation does not satisfy the definition of an inverse from group theory, that is, if is an arbitrary relation on , then does not equal the identity relation on in general.

  4. Converse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse

    Converse (logic), the result of reversing the two parts of a definite or implicational statement Converse implication, the converse of a material implication; Converse nonimplication, a logical connective which is the negation of the converse implication; Converse (semantics), pairs of words that refer to a relationship from opposite points of view

  5. Affirming the consequent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

    In propositional logic, affirming the consequent (also known as converse error, fallacy of the converse, or confusion of necessity and sufficiency) is a formal fallacy (or an invalid form of argument) that is committed when, in the context of an indicative conditional statement, it is stated that because the consequent is true, therefore the ...

  6. Logical equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalence

    In logic and mathematics, statements and are said to be logically equivalent if they have the same truth value in every model. [1] The logical equivalence of p {\displaystyle p} and q {\displaystyle q} is sometimes expressed as p ≡ q {\displaystyle p\equiv q} , p :: q {\displaystyle p::q} , E p q {\displaystyle {\textsf {E}}pq} , or p q ...

  7. Glossary of logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_logic

    A logical fallacy in which a conditional statement is incorrectly used to infer its converse. For example, from "If P then Q" and "Q", concluding "P". alethic modal logic A type of modal logic that deals with modalities of truth, such as necessity and possibility. ambiguity

  8. Converse nonimplication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_nonimplication

    In logic, converse nonimplication [1] is a logical connective which is the negation of converse implication (equivalently, the negation of the converse of implication). Definition [ edit ]

  9. Converse (semantics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_(semantics)

    [1] [2] The relationship between such words is called a converse relation. [2] Converses can be understood as a pair of words where one word implies a relationship between two objects, while the other implies the existence of the same relationship when the objects are reversed.