enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Mohan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Mohan

    The criteria set out in Mohan did not include a stand-alone requirement for experts to have independence and impartiality, but many of the lower courts have attempted to infer such a requirement. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] In 2013, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal held that that is not required. [ 3 ]

  3. Intention (criminal law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)

    Intent is defined in English law by the ruling in R v Mohan [1976] QB 1 as "the decision to bring about a prohibited consequence" (malum prohibitum). [1] [2] [3] A range of words represents shades of intent in criminal laws around the world. The mental element, or mens rea, of murder, for example, was historically called malice aforethought.

  4. English criminal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_criminal_law

    R v Mohan [1975] 2 All ER 193, intention defined as "a decision to bring about... [the actus reus ] no matter whether the accused desired that consequence of his act or not." In the special case of murder, the defendant must have appreciated (i.e. consciously recognized) that either death or serious bodily harm would be the result of his actions.

  5. R (on the application of Farrakhan) v Secretary of State for ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(on_the_application_of...

    Decision of Mr Justice Turner: Farrakhan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWHC 781 (Admin) (1 October 2001), High Court (England and Wales) Decision of the Court of Appeal: R (on the application of Farrakhan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA 606 (30 April 2002), Court of Appeal (England and Wales)

  6. Daubert standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard

    The Canadian Supreme Court expressly discussed the Daubert standard in R. v. J.-L.J., [2000]. [34] In J.-L.J., the court took a look at the development of U.S. law in this regard, noting the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of the Frye standard and its replacement with the Daubert standard.

  7. Template:Clist mens rea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Clist_mens_rea

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  8. Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Sopinka

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_of_the_Supreme...

    R v DeSousa, 1992 (Majority) Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Chiarelli , [1992] 1 SCR 711 (Majority) New Brunswick Broadcasting Co v Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House of Assembly) , [1993] 1 SCR 319 (Concurrence)

  9. Category:Canadian evidence case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Canadian_evidence...

    This page was last edited on 1 December 2014, at 23:19 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.