enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: nc ruling exclude witnesses for court reporting

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Klopfer v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klopfer_v._North_Carolina

    Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the Speedy Trial Clause of the United States Constitution in state court proceedings.

  3. American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina v. North ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties...

    The ACLU reports on its website that "The state Attorney General has 30 days [from the January 16, 2007 ruling] to decide whether to seek discretionary review by the North Carolina Supreme Court. If the North Carolina Supreme Court does not review the ruling by the Court of Appeals, then the case will go back to the superior court for a review ...

  4. North Carolina v. Alford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_v._Alford

    North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), [1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed that there are no constitutional barriers in place to prevent a judge from accepting a guilty plea from a defendant who wants to plead guilty, while still protesting his innocence, under duress, as a detainee status.

  5. Can the public fight for police body cam footage? NC high ...

    www.aol.com/public-fight-police-body-cam...

    The state Supreme Court’s ruling will likely ease the process of obtaining law enforcement recordings, which for almost a decade has been subject to an uncommon carve-out in North Carolina law.

  6. Judge strikes down North Carolina law on prosecuting ex ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-strikes-down-north...

    RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A federal judge has halted the enforcement of a North Carolina law that made it a serious crime for someone to vote while still on probation or parole for a felony ...

  7. J. D. B. v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._B._v._North_Carolina

    J. D. B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that age and mental status is relevant when determining police custody for Miranda purposes, overturning its prior ruling from seven years before. J.

  8. The seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is seen in their courtroom at the Justice Building in Raleigh, N.C., Monday, May 9, 2022.

  9. Heien v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heien_v._North_Carolina

    Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to justify a traffic stop. The Court delivered its ruling on December 15, 2014.

  1. Ad

    related to: nc ruling exclude witnesses for court reporting