enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Warrantless searches in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_searches_in...

    Warrantless searches are searches and seizures conducted without court-issued search warrants.. In the United States, warrantless searches are restricted under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not ...

  3. Arrest without warrant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrest_without_warrant

    An arrest without warrant is generally allowed when: The person has committed a felony or misdemeanor , and the officer has witnessed it A felony has been committed and the officer reasonably believes, known as probable cause , the person being arrested is the one who has committed it, as long as immediately after a warrant is obtained from the ...

  4. Johnson v. United States (1948 Fourth Amendment case)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._United_States...

    Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948), was a significant United States Supreme Court decision addressing search warrants and the Fourth Amendment.In this case, where federal agents had probable cause to search a hotel room but did not obtain a warrant, the Court declared the search was "unreasonable."

  5. Searches incident to a lawful arrest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_incident_to_a...

    Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.

  6. Welsh v. Wisconsin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_v._Wisconsin

    For example, courts have permitted warrantless home arrests for major felonies if identifiable exigencies, independent of the gravity of the offense, existed at the time of the arrest. Compare United States v. Campbell, 581 F.2d 22 (CA2 1978) (allowing warrantless home arrest for armed robbery when exigent circumstances existed), with ...

  7. Jury acquits Pierce County man whose rights were violated in ...

    www.aol.com/jury-acquits-pierce-county-man...

    A Pierce County man who was subjected to a warrantless arrest by Sheriff’s Department deputies apprehending him as an assault suspect has been acquitted.

  8. Minnesota v. Olson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_v._Olson

    Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990), is a landmark search and seizure case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.In a 7–2 decision, the court held that a person staying as a guest in the house of another had a legal expectation of privacy, and that a warrantless entry into that house to arrest the person tainted the arrest and the individual's subsequent statements.

  9. The child crimes task force has led large operations in recent years. In March, the Sheriff’s Office announced the results of a sting operation that ended with the arrests of 18 Northern ...