enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insider trading - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insider_trading

    The next expansion of insider trading liability came in SEC vs. Materia [76] 745 F.2d 197 (2d Cir. 1984), the case that first introduced the misappropriation theory of liability for insider trading. Materia, a financial printing firm proofreader, and clearly not an insider by any definition, was found to have determined the identity of takeover ...

  3. SEC Rule 10b-5 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEC_Rule_10b-5

    To what extent Rule 10b-5 prohibits insider trading is a matter of some dispute. The SEC has long advocated an "equal access theory" with regard to 10b-5, arguing that anyone who has material, non-public information must either disclose that information or abstain from trading.

  4. SEC Rule 10b5-1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEC_Rule_10b5-1

    SEC Rule 10b5-1, codified at 17 CFR 240.10b5-1, is a regulation enacted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2000. [1] The SEC states that Rule 10b5-1 was enacted in order to resolve an unsettled issue over the definition of insider trading, [2] which is prohibited by SEC Rule 10b-5.

  5. United States v. O'Hagan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._O'Hagan

    O'Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning insider trading and breach of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10(b) and 10(b)-5. In an opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg , the Court held that an individual may be found liable for violating Rule 10(b)-5 by misappropriating confidential ...

  6. Short swing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_swing

    In order to achieve its goals [of curbing the evils of insider trading], Congress chose a relatively arbitrary rule capable of easy administration. The objective standard of Section 16(b) imposes strict liability upon substantially all transactions occurring within the statutory time period, regardless of the intent of the insider or the ...

  7. SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sec_v._texas_gulf_sulphur_co.

    The Texas Gulf Sulphur decision represented the first time a federal court held that insider trading violated federal securities laws. [2] The SEC in Cady, Roberts & Co. (1961) had extensively treated insider trading and set out the "disclose or abstain rule", but as an agency opinion, it did not have precedential value in federal courts. [35]

  8. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Gulf_Sulphur_Company

    Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. was a landmark of the jurisprudence of insider trading in the United States. In 1971, S.E.C. v. Texas Gulf Sulphur became the first insider trading case to be litigated in federal courts in American history, making the beginning of disgorgement in S.E.C. cases.

  9. Form 4 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_4

    Form 4 is a United States SEC filing that relates to insider trading.Every director, officer and owner of more than 10 percent of a class of a particular company's equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission a statement of ownership regarding such security.