Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 4 January 2025. American review aggregator for film and television Rotten Tomatoes Screenshot Rotten Tomatoes's homepage as of April 1, 2021 Type of site Film and television review aggregator and user community Country of origin United States Owner Warner Bros. Discovery (25%) Comcast (75%) Founder(s ...
Rotten Tomatoes logo. On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, a film has a rating of 100% if each professional review recorded by the website is assessed as positive rather than negative. The percentage is based on the film's reviews aggregated by the website and assessed as positive or negative, and when all aggregated reviews are ...
Roblox occasionally hosts real-life and virtual events. They have in the past hosted events such as BloxCon, which was a convention for ordinary players on the platform. [46] Roblox operates annual Easter egg hunts [52] and also hosts an annual event called the "Bloxy Awards", an awards ceremony that also functions as a fundraiser. The 2020 ...
Allyson Cochran, writing for The Gamer, applauded the game's "astonishingly impressive graphics", further elaborating that it would "leave you questioning if you've stumbled upon a Roblox game at all". [103] Logan Gilchrist of Dot Esports called the game "interesting because it provides more story than the average Roblox horror game". [104]
English-language: Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic link to reviews that are English-language and are published in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and similar territories. Foreign-language films at the websites are scored using English-language reviews, so ensure this English-language context and seek out other sources to ...
The list shows the 100% rating of 2022 documentary "Attica" as being based on 56 reviews. But the wiki article about "Attica" states that "On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 98% of 48 critics' reviews are positive". Therefore FIRSTLY either the listing or the article sentence is wrong.
Nonetheless, Rotten Tomatoes bypasses this problem by only permitting the reviewer to give a single positive or negative vote, and I believe that this makes it a superior system. I was mildly surprised that there wasn't a note to this effect in the article, but I suppose that the explanation is a bit on the lengthy side.
The film has a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on seven reviews. [ 4 ] Jesse Hassenger of Paste gave the film a positive review and wrote, "In its clear-eyed and naturalistic way, Smoking Tigers takes on a surprising fullness."