Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Grayzone is an American news website and blog [6] described as fringe [12] and far-left by numerous sources. [23] It was founded and edited by American journalist Max Blumenthal. [3] The website was initially founded as The Grayzone Project [24] and was affiliated with AlterNet until early 2018. [9]
Max Blumenthal (born December 18, 1977) is an American journalist, author, blogger, and filmmaker. He was a writer for The Nation, AlterNet, [2] The Daily Beast, Al Akhbar, Mondoweiss, [3] and Media Matters for America, [4] [5] and has contributed to Al Jazeera English, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times. [4]
Democratic Review DemocraticReview.com Defunct Owned by American Review LLC of Miami, the same company that owns American News (americannews.com), Conservative 101 and Liberal Society. [12] [14] Liberal Society LiberalSociety.com Defunct Published a fake direct quote attributed to Obama, Falsely claimed that the White House fired Kellyanne Conway.
The World magazine article is in part a defense of Zenz's research, and it most directly engages with The Grayzone's claims. I expanded the coverage of it in the body for that reason, but I can maybe go back and try to trim it. The Axios article mentions Zenz as well, and frames skepticism of him as "denialism". Al Jazeera doesn't mention him ...
Aaron Maté is a Canadian writer and journalist. [2] [3] He hosts the show Pushback with Aaron Maté on The Grayzone [2] and, as of January 2022, he fills in as a host on the Useful Idiots podcast. [4]
EditorA makes an edit to an article, a “bad edit”, which does not adhere to a neutral point of view. This is by no means the first time that EditorA has made such an edit. EditorB reverts that edit, and on the discussion page (or in the edit summary) says. “I reverted your edit, EdA, because you are a POV-pusher, pushing a POV".
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...
Jump to content