Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This article lists the Human Development Index rating of each U.S. state, territory, and federal district according to the UN. All U.S. states and territories have a very high (greater than 0.800) HDI.
Territory [1] HDI Data Year Status Guam 0.901: 2008: Very High human development US Virgin Islands 0.894: 2008: Very High human development Puerto Rico 0.880: 2024: Very High human development
This is a list of U.S. states and territories by economic growth rate.This article includes a list of the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and the 5 inhabited U.S. territories sorted by economic growth — the percentage change in real GDP for the third quarter of 2023 is listed (for the 50 states and District of Columbia), using the most recent data available from the U.S. Bureau of ...
U.S. states by R&D spending 2020 (in adjusted 2020 dollars) National rank State Expenditures on R&D (millions of US$) [1] Expenditures on R&D per capita in US$ [2] Federal government share in % [3] Expenditures on R&D in % of GDP [1] 1 California: 217,976 4,220 1.6 7.05% 2 Washington: 46,392 4,496 0.6 7.50% 3 Massachusetts: 44,907 5,188 1.3 7.69% 4
This is a list of U.S. states, territories, and Washington, D.C. by income. Data is given according to the 2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimates, except for the American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for which the data comes from 2010, as ACS does not operate in these areas. [note 1]
Population 2020 Population growth rate 2010-2020 Racial characteristics of population % foreign born population Life expectancy in years 2022 % of people in poverty % of 25+ year old people with bachelor or higher degrees % of people without health insurance % vote for Biden in 2020 election [1] [2] United States: $37,638: $69,201: 331,449,520 ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The Fisc states that the federal deficit increased due to human resource expenditures, increased tax cuts, and increased military expenditure during the 1980s. The Fisc further reports that in expectations and defense spending declined in the 1990s one would expect the expenditure per state to decrease along with the government.