enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court denies California's plea for immunity for COVID ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-denies-california...

    The Supreme Court on Monday turned down an appeal from California prison officials who sought immunity from lawsuits for having transferred inmates with COVID-19 to San Quentin in May 2020 ...

  3. 9th Circuit reverses itself, upholds 'qualified immunity' for ...

    www.aol.com/news/9th-circuit-reverses-itself...

    With two split panels in a row ruling in opposite ways, the case could be taken up by a 11-judge "en banc" panel of the 9th Circuit or appealed to the conservative U.S. Supreme Court, which has ...

  4. Supreme Court denies California’s appeal for immunity for ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-denies-california...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied an appeal from California corrections officials who sought immunity from lawsuits claiming they acted with deliberate indifference when they caused a deadly ...

  5. Saucier v. Katz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saucier_v._Katz

    The Supreme Court held that qualified immunity analysis must proceed in two steps. A court must first ask whether "the facts alleged show the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right". Then, if a constitutional right was violated, the court would go on to determine whether the constitutional right was "clearly established".

  6. Taylor v. Riojas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._Riojas

    Taylor v. Riojas, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with qualified immunity.It was the first case in which the Supreme Court relied on the obviousness of a constitutional violation to overturn a lower court's decision to grant qualified immunity.

  7. Trump v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)

    United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision [1] [2] of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that ...

  8. Pearson v. Callahan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Callahan

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court dealing with the doctrine of qualified immunity. [1]The case centered on the application of mandatory sequencing in determining qualified immunity as set by the 2001 decision, Saucier v.

  9. Opinion: We should all dissent from the Supreme Court's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-dissent-supreme-courts...

    Read more:Supreme Court gives Trump broad immunity from prosecution — for the past and perhaps future Although the Supreme Court did not go as far as Trump wanted, its ruling is a clear victory ...