enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.

  3. Colorado v. Connelly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_v._Connelly

    Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that was initiated by Francis Connelly, who insisted that his schizophrenic episode rendered him incompetent, nullifying his waiver of his Miranda rights.

  4. Massiah v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massiah_v._United_States

    Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from eliciting statements from the defendant about themselves after the point that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches.

  5. Vega v. Tekoh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_v._Tekoh

    In the United States, Miranda warnings were established from the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona and upheld in Dickerson v. United States, establishing that under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, statements made by a suspect while both in police custody and directly being questioned cannot be used as evidence in trial unless they were notified of their rights to ...

  6. Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.

  7. Miranda Derrick responds to 'Dancing for the Devil' doc: 'A ...

    www.aol.com/news/miranda-derrick-responds...

    “Miranda Derrick is a successful businesswoman and a loving wife and daughter who cares very much about her family,” the representative said in a statement provided to the Daily Beast ...

  8. Trump’s advisers fretted about letting ‘Trump be Trump.’ He ...

    www.aol.com/news/trump-advisers-fretted-letting...

    (Reuters) - In the weeks after Vice President Kamala Harris’ rapid ascent to the top of the Democratic ticket, Donald Trump’s allies and advisers urged him to stay on message.

  9. Brown v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Illinois

    In the case syllabus, the US Supreme Court sums up its holding in three parts: "The Illinois courts erred in adopting a per se rule that Miranda warnings in and of themselves broke the causal chain so that any subsequent statement, even one induced by the continuing effects of unconstitutional custody, was admissible so long as, in the traditional sense, it was voluntary and not coerced in ...