Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
North Carolina Public Records Law NCGS Chapter 132–1 to 132-11 1995 [45] Any person North Dakota Open Records Statute NDCC §§ 44-04-18 to 44-04-32 1957 [46] Any person Ohio Ohio Open Records Law Ohio Rev. Code §§ 149.43 to 149.45; 2743.75 1963 [47] Any person Oklahoma Oklahoma Open Records Act Title 51 Oklahoma Statutes §§ 24A.1 to 24A.32
The Piedmont Park Conservancy is a private non-profit that oversees and manages Piedmont Park.In 2007, when the organization moved forward with a plan to install a controversial parking structure, a group opposed to the plan—Friends of Piedmont Park—filed an open record request under Georgia Georgia's open records legislationn [1] for records of the Conservancy.
The court record summaries provided by the system are all public records under Wisconsin open records law sections 19.31-19.39 of the Wisconsin Statutes. WCCA was created in response to an increasing number of requests for court records from district attorneys, sheriffs’ departments, and
According to the OLR complaint, Gableman was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1994 and has no prior disciplinary history. ... Violated the state's open records law.
The DOJ's Office of Open Government also answers questions about public records laws and can be contacted at opengov@widoj.gov or 608-267-2220. Quinn Clark is a Public Investigator reporter. She ...
Wisconsin's Democratic secretary of state settled an open records lawsuit brought by a conservative policy group on Wednesday, agreeing to respond to all future requests even when her office has ...
Freedom of information laws allow access by the general public to data held by national governments and, where applicable, by state and local governments. The emergence of freedom of information legislation was a response to increasing dissatisfaction with the secrecy surrounding government policy development and decision making. [1]
Second, unlike judges and legislators, the creators of annotations are incentivised by copyright law and profits. Third, while copyrighting judicial opinions and statutes would be contrary to fair notice of the laws, i.e., the legal presumption that every citizen is aware of the law, the same does not apply to annotations since they are non ...