enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. False statement of fact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statement_of_fact

    The legal rule itself – how to apply this exception – is complicated, as it is often dependent on who said the statement and which actor it was directed towards. [6] The analysis is thus different if the government or a public figure is the target of the false statement (where the speech may get more protection) than a private individual who is being attacked over a matter of their private ...

  3. Derry v Peek - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derry_v_Peek

    Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1 is a case on English contract law, fraudulent misstatement, and the tort of deceit. Derry v Peek established a 3-part test for fraudulent misrepresentation, [1] whereby the defendant is fraudulent if he: (i) knows the statement to be false, [2] or (ii) does not believe in the statement, [3] or (iii) is reckless as to ...

  4. Edgington v Fitzmaurice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgington_v_Fitzmaurice

    He said, [1] It is true that if he had not supposed he would have a charge he would not have taken the debentures; but if he also relied on the misstatement in the prospectus, his loss nonetheless resulted from that misstatement. It is not necessary to show that the misstatement was the sole cause of his acting as he did.

  5. Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedley_Byrne_&_Co_Ltd_v...

    Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465 is an English tort law case on economic loss in English tort law resulting from a negligent misstatement. Prior to the decision, the notion that a party may owe another a duty of care for statements made in reliance had been rejected, [1] with the only remedy for such losses being in contract law. [2]

  6. Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esso_Petroleum_Co_Ltd_v_Mardon

    Mr Mardon was buying a petrol station franchised by Esso Petroleum Co Ltd. Esso told him they had estimated that the throughput of a petrol station in Eastbank Street, Southport, would be 200,000 gallons a year; however, the local council had made a decision regarding planning permission which meant that there would be no direct access from the main street and therefore fewer customers.

  7. Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royscot_Trust_Ltd_v_Rogerson

    Nevertheless neither of these facts is conclusive in determining whether the sale of the car was a novus actus sufficient to break the chain of causation: see generally Clerk & Lindsell on Torts, 16th ed. (1989), pp. 81-86, paras. 1-117 to 1-121 and McGregor on Damages , 15th ed. (1988), pp. 92-94, paras. 152-156. However, if the dealer should ...

  8. Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walsh_v_Jones_Lang_Lasalle_Ltd

    Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle Ltd [2017] IESC 38, is a decision of the Irish Supreme Court in which the court held that a purchaser bears the risk of reliance on erroneous information unless the vendor has clearly assumed responsibility for its accuracy.

  9. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TSC_Industries,_Inc._v...

    Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability denied, 361 F. Supp. 108 (N.D. Ill. 1973), affirmed in part, reversed in part, 512 F.2d 324; cert. granted, 423 U.S. 820 (1975). Holding A misstated or omitted fact in a proxy solicitation is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it ...