Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A week after signing with Matchroom, the Usyk vs. Bellew fight was announced to take place on 10 November at the Manchester Arena. [14] [15] Bellew's guaranteed purse for the fight was £4 million. [16] Speaking in the build up to the bout Bellew said "I feel fantastic. Fat boy is in shape. Usyk is in the deep end. There will be war.
Anthony Lewis Bellew (born 30 November 1982) is an English former professional boxer who competed from 2007 to 2018, and has since worked as a boxing analyst and commentator. He held the WBC cruiserweight title from 2016 to 2017.
On 14 March, Hearn said that Bellew would fight again in 2017, [17] however a day later, he told Sky Sports that Bellew may need surgery on his broken hand which could see him out of action for up to five months. [18] On 28 March, the WBC changed Bellew's world championship status to "Emeritus" champion.
Full case name: Fortex Group Ltd (in Receivership and Liquidation) v MacIntosh : Decided: 30 March 1998: Citation [1998] 3 NZLR 171: Court membership; Judges sitting: Gault, Henry J, Keith, Blanchard J, Tipping
The Supreme Court declined to follow the case of Computer Edge Pty. Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc. [3] decided by the High Court of Australia, which had virtually identical facts. In that case, the court held that the chips contained a "sequence of electrical impulses" which could not be subject to copyright.
The book draws from both well-known decisions of federal courts as well as less well known cases in explaining the doctrines of federal Indian law. The case of Johnson v. McIntosh by the Supreme Court in 1823 is well known to most law students as declaring that Indian tribes had the right to occupy the land but only the United States held title ...
McIntosh, [a] 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), also written M‘Intosh, is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchase lands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief Justice John Marshall , the successor in interest to a private purchase from the Piankeshaw attempted to ...
Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of various conditions of confinement of inmates held in federal short-term detention facilities. [1]