Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Polarizability has the SI units of C·m 2 ·V −1 = A 2 ·s 4 ·kg −1 while its cgs unit is cm 3. Usually it is expressed in cgs units as a so-called polarizability volume, sometimes expressed in Å 3 = 10 −24 cm 3. One can convert from SI units to cgs units (′) as follows:
In the CGS system of units the Clausius–Mossotti relation is typically rewritten to show the molecular polarizability volume ′ = which has units of volume [m 3]. [2] Confusion may arise from the practice of using the shorter name "molecular polarizability" for both α {\displaystyle \alpha } and α ′ {\displaystyle \alpha '} within ...
One difference between the Gaussian and SI systems is in the factor 4π in various formulas that relate the quantities that they define. With SI electromagnetic units, called rationalized, [3] [4] Maxwell's equations have no explicit factors of 4π in the formulae, whereas the inverse-square force laws – Coulomb's law and the Biot–Savart law – do have a factor of 4π attached to the r 2.
The polarizability of individual particles in the medium can be related to the average susceptibility and polarization density by the Clausius–Mossotti relation. In general, the susceptibility is a function of the frequency ω of the applied field.
In the CGS-ESU system, charge q is therefore has the dimension to M 1/2 L 3/2 T −1. Other units in the CGS-ESU system include the statampere (1 statC/s) and statvolt (1 erg/statC). In CGS-ESU, all electric and magnetic quantities are dimensionally expressible in terms of length, mass, and time, and none has an independent dimension.
Molar refractivity, [1] [2], is a measure of the total polarizability of a mole of a substance. For a perfect dielectric which is made of one type of molecule, the molar refractivity is proportional to the polarizability of a single molecule of the substance. For real materials, intermolecular interactions (the effect of the induced dipole ...
However, care is needed because some authors [6] take out the factor from (), so that = and hence () = /, which is convenient because then the (hyper-)polarizability may be accurately called the (nonlinear-)susceptibility per molecule, but at the same time inconvenient because of the inconsistency with the usual linear polarisability definition ...
In many materials the polarizability starts to saturate at high values of electric field. This saturation can be modelled by a nonlinear susceptibility. These susceptibilities are important in nonlinear optics and lead to effects such as second-harmonic generation (such as used to convert infrared light into visible light, in green laser pointers).