Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Reliable scholarship – Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable, where the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses.
For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is ...
According to our content guideline on identifying reliable sources, a reliable source has the following characteristics: It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published. It is appropriate for the material in question, i.e., the source is directly about the subject, rather than mentioning something unrelated in passing.
As a reliable source: * Maybe. eBay has been used by reliable sources for historical auction records. Editors should use common sense here by making sure that the auction is noteworthy before adding the source. Common issues: Make sure you archive the source as links to eBay expire after a period of time.
That means if they are a professor at an established university and that's their main source of income, they have an incentive to avoid outright mendacity, since that'll get you fired. Newspaper reporter, same thing.
A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar .
Verbit examined news articles and legal research to see what the rise of artificial intelligence means for creators. AI art is facing a copyright problem. Here's what it means for creators.
Any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research. The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to cite a reliable published source that contains the same material.