enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's...

    The Supreme Court confirmed the draft's authenticity the next day; at the same time, the Supreme Court's press release said that "it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case". [105] [106] [107] In response to the leak, Roberts said, "The work of the Court will not be affected in ...

  3. Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut

    Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects the liberty of married couples to use contraceptives without government restriction. [1]

  4. Abortion Opponents Are Also Threatening Birth Control Access

    www.aol.com/abortion-opponents-threatening-birth...

    W hen the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 1965 ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut and legalized the use of contraception by married women, the public response was muted. There is little evidence of ...

  5. Dobbs decision anniversary: Virginia Democrats push access to ...

    www.aol.com/dobbs-decision-anniversary-virginia...

    The Dobbs decision, a 6-3 ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, effectively overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 after former President Donald Trump appointed three conservative Supreme Court ...

  6. There are enough votes on the Supreme Court to uphold new restrictions on Plan B and birth control, experts say. ‘Angry Court’ Might Come After Contraception Next, Experts Warn Skip to main ...

  7. Eisenstadt v. Baird - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

    Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples. The Court struck down a Massachusetts law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried people for the purpose of preventing pregnancy, ruling ...

  8. Biden proposes requiring private insurers cover over-the ...

    www.aol.com/biden-proposes-requiring-private...

    Connecticut, the 1965 Supreme Court opinion that invalidated a law that forbid contraception based on a right to privacy. "I think he just said the quiet part out loud," Harris said at the time.

  9. Contraceptive mandate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraceptive_mandate

    Reproductive rights groups and others used that decision as leverage to force other companies to settle lawsuits and agree to change their insurance plans to include birth control. Some subsequent court decisions echoed Erickson, and some went the other way, but the rule (absent a Supreme Court decision) remained, and over the following decade ...