enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shapiro says Trump has ‘buyer’s remorse’ on Vance - AOL

    www.aol.com/shapiro-says-trump-buyer-remorse...

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) quipped that former President Trump has “buyer’s remorse” over choosing Ohio Sen. JD Vance (R) as his running mate, while talking to reporters Friday.

  3. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    "Stop and identify" laws in different states that appear to be nearly identical may be different in effect because of interpretations by state courts. For example, California "stop and identify" law, Penal Code §647(e) had wording [37] [38] [39] similar to the Nevada law upheld in Hiibel, but a California appellate court, in People v.

  4. Pennsylvania v. Mimms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Mimms

    Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court criminal law decision holding that a police officer ordering a person out of a car following a traffic stop and conducting a pat-down to check for weapons did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  5. Homebuyer's Remorse? Law Can Help - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2010-10-27-homebuyers-remorse...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Buyer's remorse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyer's_remorse

    Buyer's remorse is a powerful experience for consumers. For years, marketers have been attempting to reduce buyer's remorse through many different methods. One specific technique employed by marketers is the inclusion of a coupon towards a future purchase at the point of sale. This has many benefits for both the consumer and retailer.

  7. Feeling Buyer’s Remorse After Purchasing a Home? Take ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/feeling-buyer-remorse...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Ohio v. Robinette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Robinette

    Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.

  9. Homebuyer's Remorse? You Can't Take Back a House - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/on-homebuyers-remorse-real...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us