Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A variant of Gaussian elimination called Gauss–Jordan elimination can be used for finding the inverse of a matrix, if it exists. If A is an n × n square matrix, then one can use row reduction to compute its inverse matrix, if it exists. First, the n × n identity matrix is augmented to the right of A, forming an n × 2n block matrix [A | I].
The following algorithm is essentially a modified form of Gaussian elimination. Computing an LU decomposition using this algorithm requires floating-point operations, ignoring lower-order terms. Partial pivoting adds only a quadratic term; this is not the case for full pivoting. [13]
This system has the exact solution of x 1 = 10.00 and x 2 = 1.000, but when the elimination algorithm and backwards substitution are performed using four-digit arithmetic, the small value of a 11 causes small round-off errors to be propagated. The algorithm without pivoting yields the approximation of x 1 ≈ 9873.3 and x 2 ≈ 4.
A frontal solver is an approach to solving sparse linear systems which is used extensively in finite element analysis. [1] Algorithms of this kind are variants of Gauss elimination that automatically avoids a large number of operations involving zero terms due to the fact that the matrix is only sparse. [2]
Decomposition: = where C is an m-by-r full column rank matrix and F is an r-by-n full row rank matrix Comment: The rank factorization can be used to compute the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse of A , [ 2 ] which one can apply to obtain all solutions of the linear system A x = b {\displaystyle A\mathbf {x} =\mathbf {b} } .
The reduced row echelon form of a matrix is unique and does not depend on the sequence of elementary row operations used to obtain it. The variant of Gaussian elimination that transforms a matrix to reduced row echelon form is sometimes called Gauss–Jordan elimination. A matrix is in column echelon form if its transpose is in
No (partial) pivoting is necessary for a strictly column diagonally dominant matrix when performing Gaussian elimination (LU factorization). The Jacobi and Gauss–Seidel methods for solving a linear system converge if the matrix is strictly (or irreducibly) diagonally dominant. Many matrices that arise in finite element methods are diagonally ...
The Crout matrix decomposition algorithm differs slightly from the Doolittle method. Doolittle's method returns a unit lower triangular matrix and an upper triangular matrix, while the Crout method returns a lower triangular matrix and a unit upper triangular matrix. So, if a matrix decomposition of a matrix A is such that: A = LDU