Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In version 2.0 DEV, ACQ and SVC were merged into a single model where each process area potentially has a specific reference to one or more of these three aspects. Trying to keep up with the industry the model also has explicit reference to agile aspects in some process areas. Some key differences between v1.3 and v2.0 models are given below:
CMMI for Development, Version 1.2 contains 22 process areas indicating the aspects of product and service development that are to be covered by organizational processes. For a summary of process areas for each model, see these quick reference documents available on the SEI website: CMMI for Acquisition ; CMMI for Development ; CMMI for Services
The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) project was formed to sort out the problem of using multiple models for software development processes, thus the CMMI model has superseded the CMMI model, though the CMMI model continues to be a general theoretical process capability model used in the public domain. [16] [citation needed] [17]
The suite of documents associated with a particular version of the CMMI includes a requirements specification called the Appraisal Requirements for CMMI (ARC), [2] which specifies three levels of formality for appraisals: Class A, B, and C. Formal (Class A) SCAMPIs are conducted by SEI-authorized Lead Appraisers who use the SCAMPI A Method Definition Document (MDD) [3] to conduct the appraisals.
ISO/IEC 15504 is the reference model for the maturity models (consisting of capability levels which in turn consist of the process attributes and further consist of generic practices) against which the assessors can place the evidence that they collect during their assessment, so that the assessors can give an overall determination of the organization's capabilities for delivering products ...
Automotive SPICE is a maturity model adapted for the automotive industry. It assesses the maturity of development processes for electronic and software-based systems (e.g., ECUs).
SOURCE: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, California State University-Long Beach (2014, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013).Read our methodology here.. HuffPost and The Chronicle examined 201 public D-I schools from 2010-2014.
Like in the Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement , there are three different classes of assessment in TIPA. A TIPA assessment can be performed using Class 1, 2 or 3 depending on the level of confidence required on the assessment results, and on the amount of resources available to perform that assessment.