Ad
related to: commentary on revelations 3:15-16 20 22 23
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Revelation 3 is the third chapter of the Book of Revelation or the Apocalypse of John in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. The book is traditionally attributed to John the Apostle , [ 1 ] but the precise identity of the author remains a point of academic debate. [ 2 ]
Clavis Apocalyptica (1627), a commentary on The Apocalypse by Joseph Mede. [83] Anacrisis Apocalypseos (1705), a commentary on The Apocalypse by Campegius Vitringa. [84] Commentary on the Revelation of St. John (1720), a commentary on The Apocalypse by Charles Daubuz. [85] The Signs of the Times (1832), a commentary on The Apocalypse by Rev. Dr ...
The seventh period was to be the earthly Millennium, which would begin in 1260 (the number 1260 comes from Apocalypse 11:3, where it mentions 1,260 days). [22] [23] He associated the apocalyptic beast with Islam, while the second beast was identified with heretics (primarily the patarini). Joachim interpreted chapter 20 of the Apocalypse in ...
The Judgment of the two Beasts, the Dragon, and the Dead (19:11–20:15) The Beast and the False Prophet are cast into the Lake of Fire. (19:11–21) The Dragon is imprisoned in the Bottomless Pit for a thousand years. (20:1–3) The resurrected martyrs live and reign with Christ for a thousand years. (20:4–6) After the Thousand Years
For instance Revelation is not always chronological (e.g. Jesus' death in Revelation 12:10,11 cannot follow 11:15 where He reigns; and Babylon's activities in chapter 17 cannot follow its destruction in chapter 16), but many visions are parallel, and progressively illuminate themes.
Revelation† 1:1-5:14; 20:1-22:21 7 Royal Site of San Lorenzo de El Escorial, C. III. 6, fol. 235-241 San Lorenzo de El Escorial: Spain INTF: 2051 16th Andreas of Caesarea Commentary on Revelation 83 National Library, 4750, fol. 303-385 Madrid: Spain INTF: 2052 16th Andreas of Caesarea Commentary on Revelation† 1:1-4:11; 5:6-7:5 32
In 1866, [14] when C. F. Zimpel defended the hypothesis that the first horseman was the Antichrist (and more precisely, according to him, Napoleon Bonaparte). [15] The Antichrist interpretation later found champions in the United States, such as R. F. Franklin in 1898 [16] and W. C. Stevens in 1928. [17]
His principal work is a commentary on the Book of Revelation [2] and is the oldest Greek commentary on that book written by a recognized Father of the Church. (The very first Greek commentary on Revelation may barely predate Andrew's work and is attributed to Oikoumenios.) [3] Most subsequent Eastern Christian commentators of the Book of Revelation have drawn heavily upon Andrew and his ...
Ad
related to: commentary on revelations 3:15-16 20 22 23