Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] 2 AC 291 is a leading English trusts law case, concerning resulting trusts. It demonstrates that the mere intention to not have a resulting trust (for example, to avoid taxes) does not make it so. This case was the first in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell's trusts and his tax ...
However, this scheme was defeated in the case Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners. [3] Vandervell therefore had the shares repurchased by a trust company set up to manage his children's inheritance, through an option that had been granted during the setup of the original tax-avoidance scheme.
This case was the second in a series of decisions involving Tony Vandervell's trusts and his tax liability. The first was Vandervell v Inland Revenue Commissioners , [ 1 ] which concerned whether an oral instruction to transfer an equitable interest in shares complied with the writing requirement under Law of Property Act 1925 , section 53(1)(c ...
Pages in category "1966 in United Kingdom case law" The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. ... V. Vandervell v IRC; W. Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd
Barnes v Addy; Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd; Belchier v Parsons; Belmont Finance Corp Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan; Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell (No 2) Blackwell v Blackwell; Boardman v Phipps; Boyce v Boyce; Brinks Ltd v Abu-Saleh (No 3) Brown v Burdett; Brown v ...
I can’t forget the $107,000-a-year administrator’s arrest in March 2018 ― six weeks after retiring with a valuable pension and taking home about $35,000 in unused vacation and sick time ...
When this occurs, the property is held on resulting trust for the settlor, as in Vandervell v IRC. [17] This also occurs where a trust is formed over property which requires formality, but is improperly created (for example, a land transfer that does not adhere to the Law of Property Act 1925). [18]
Though a nonprofit, Hospice of the Comforter awarded bonuses pegged to admissions, the lawsuit contends. In November, the hospice agreed to pay $3 million to settle the case, a sum substantially less than the $10 million the bogus claims cost Medicare, according to a failed appeal of the deal.