enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Litigation involving Apple Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple...

    The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]

  3. United States v. Apple (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Apple_(2024)

    United States v. Apple; Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey: Full case name: United States of America, State of New Jersey, State of Arizona, State of California, District of Columbia, State of Connecticut, State of Maine, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of New Hampshire, State of New York, State of North Dakota, State of Oklahoma, State of Oregon ...

  4. Apple Inc. v. Pepper - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Pepper

    Apple Inc. v. Pepper, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case related to antitrust laws related to third-party resellers. [1] The case centers on Apple Inc.'s App Store, and whether consumers of apps offered through the store have Article III standing under federal antitrust laws to bring a class-action antitrust lawsuit against Apple for practices it uses to regulate the ...

  5. The Supreme Court allows a court order to take effect that ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-allows-court...

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed a court order to take effect that could loosen Apple's grip on its lucrative iPhone app store, and potentially affect billions of dollars in revenue a year.

  6. Justice Kagan order: Apple doesn’t have to change app store ...

    www.aol.com/justice-kagan-order-apple-doesn...

    A judicial order forcing Apple to change some of its app store terms will not need to take immediate effect while litigation over the decision plays out, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said on ...

  7. Spotify and its CEO Daniel Ek want Apple to drop the commission fee it charges the group when customers buy a subscription through the App Store.

  8. High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee...

    In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509 [10]) is a class-action lawsuit on behalf of over 64,000 employees of Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm (the last two are subsidiaries of Disney) against their employer alleging that their wages were ...

  9. US Supreme Court refuses Epic bid to let App Store order take ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-refuses-epic...

    (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday dealt a setback to Epic Games, maker of the popular video game "Fortnite," in its legal battle against Apple, declining to let a federal judge's ...