Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Shapiro–Wilk test tests the null hypothesis that a sample x 1, ..., x n came from a normally distributed population. The test statistic is = (= ()) = (¯), where with parentheses enclosing the subscript index i is the ith order statistic, i.e., the ith-smallest number in the sample (not to be confused with ).
Shapiro–Wilk test: interval: univariate: 1: Normality test: sample size between 3 and 5000 [16] Kolmogorov–Smirnov test: interval: 1: Normality test: distribution parameters known [16] Shapiro-Francia test: interval: univariate: 1: Normality test: Simpliplification of Shapiro–Wilk test Lilliefors test: interval: 1: Normality test
N = the sample size The resulting value can be compared with a chi-square distribution to determine the goodness of fit. The chi-square distribution has ( k − c ) degrees of freedom , where k is the number of non-empty bins and c is the number of estimated parameters (including location and scale parameters and shape parameters) for the ...
A normal Q–Q plot of randomly generated, independent standard exponential data, (X ~ Exp(1)). This Q–Q plot compares a sample of data on the vertical axis to a statistical population on the horizontal axis. The points follow a strongly nonlinear pattern, suggesting that the data are not distributed as a standard normal (X ~ N(0,1)). The ...
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test: this test only works if the mean and the variance of the normal distribution are assumed known under the null hypothesis, Lilliefors test: based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, adjusted for when also estimating the mean and variance from the data, Shapiro–Wilk test, and; Pearson's chi-squared test.
One might assume that the covariance-adjusted weighting of different order statistics used by the Shapiro–Wilk test should make it slightly better, but in practice the Shapiro–Wilk and Shapiro–Francia variants are about equally good. In fact, the Shapiro–Francia variant actually exhibits more power to distinguish some alternative ...
A normal quantile plot for a simulated set of test statistics that have been standardized to be Z-scores under the null hypothesis. The departure of the upper tail of the distribution from the expected trend along the diagonal is due to the presence of substantially more large test statistic values than would be expected if all null hypotheses were true.
Confidence bands can be constructed around estimates of the empirical distribution function.Simple theory allows the construction of point-wise confidence intervals, but it is also possible to construct a simultaneous confidence band for the cumulative distribution function as a whole by inverting the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, or by using non-parametric likelihood methods.