enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. In re Himmel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Himmel

    In 1991, California declined to follow the Himmel rule and adopted Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068(o), which requires an attorney to self-report misconduct but not the misconduct of other attorneys. [8] The Rhode Island Supreme Court also distinguished the case in In re Ethics Advisory Panel Opinion No. 92-1. [9]

  3. Regulation D (SEC) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_D_(SEC)

    In other words, if an issuer complies with the requirements of Rule 506, it can be assured that its offering is "non-public," and thus that it is exempt from registration. Rule 507 penalizes issuers who do not file the Form D, as required by Rule 503. Rule 508 provides the guidelines under which the SEC enforces Regulation D against issuers.

  4. D 506 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_506

    Rule D 506, a rule of the US Securities Exchange Commission exempting certain businesses from securities regulation Topics referred to by the same term This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title formed as a letter–number combination.

  5. Uniform Securities Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Securities_Act

    The Uniform Securities Act (USA) is a model statute designed to guide each state in drafting its state securities law. It was created by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL).

  6. Illinois Compiled Statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Compiled_Statutes

    [1] [2] The compilation organizes the general Acts of Illinois into 67 chapters arranged within 9 major topic areas. [3] The ILCS took effect in 1993, replacing the previous numbering scheme generally known as the Illinois Revised Statutes (Ill. Rev. Stat.), the latest of which had been adopted in 1874 but appended by private publishers since. [3]

  7. After ruling against White Castle in a biometric case that potentially could have cost the company $17 billion, the Illinois Supreme Court hinted that the General Assembly may want to clarify the law.

  8. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Brick_Co._v._Illinois

    Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court case that involved issues concerning statutory standing in antitrust law.. The decision established the rule that indirect purchasers of goods or services along a supply chain cannot seek damages for antitrust violations committed by the original manufacturer or service provider, but it permitted such claims ...

  9. Report finds Illinois with over $200 billion in total liabilities

    www.aol.com/news/report-finds-illinois-over-200...

    Illinois is one of ten states that account for nearly 85% of the total employee-related debt among all 50 states. At the end of 2022, Illinois had $10,915 in pension liabilities per capita ...