enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

    Dred Scott v. Sandford, [a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 60

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), is the most notorious and condemned decision in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. In it, the Court held that the US Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for black people , regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and so the rights and privileges that the Constitution ...

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) People of African descent that are slaves or were slaves and subsequently freed, along with their descendants, cannot be United States citizens. Consequently, they cannot sue in federal court.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Taney Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Hotchkiss v. Greenwood: 52 U.S. 248 (1851) Early standard for non-obviousness in United States patent law: Strader v. Graham: 51 U.S. 82 (1851) slavery and the application of state laws thereof Cooley v. Board of Wardens: 53 U.S. 299 (1852) pilotage laws under the Commerce Clause: Dred Scott v. Sandford: 60 U.S. 393 (1857) slavery, the ...

  6. Robert Cooper Grier - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Cooper_Grier

    As one of two Northern members of the majority in the Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) decision, Grier concurred that African Americans were not and were never meant to be citizens of the United States and that the property rights of slaveholders were clearly protected in the U.S. Constitution, after being pressured by President-elect James ...

  7. Was Chief Justice Roger Taney reasonable in Dred Scott v ...

    www.aol.com/news/chief-justice-roger-taney...

    I write now with some trepidation, since my thesis is that it was a reasonable decision for the times, 1857. Was Chief Justice Roger Taney reasonable in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)?

  8. Republican group cites notorious Dred Scott ruling as reason ...

    www.aol.com/republican-group-cites-notorious...

    The group then cites six cases including Dred Scott v Sandford. The 1857 ruling came a few years before the 1861 outbreak of the US Civil War over the issue of slavery, stating that enslaved ...

  9. Taney Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taney_Court

    Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): In a 7–2 decision in which all nine justices wrote an opinion, Chief Justice Taney wrote the majority opinion. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, and held that the plaintiff remained a slave of the defendant.