Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As 2 and 3 are coprime, the intersection of GF(4) and GF(8) in GF(64) is the prime field GF(2). The union of GF(4) and GF(8) has thus 10 elements. The remaining 54 elements of GF(64) generate GF(64) in the sense that no other subfield contains any of them. It follows that they are roots of irreducible polynomials of degree 6 over GF(2). This ...
every element x of GF(2) satisfies x + x = 0 and therefore −x = x; this means that the characteristic of GF(2) is 2; every element x of GF(2) satisfies x 2 = x (i.e. is idempotent with respect to multiplication); this is an instance of Fermat's little theorem. GF(2) is the only field with this property (Proof: if x 2 = x, then either x = 0 or ...
Thus, to prove that Fermat's equation has no solutions for n > 2, it would suffice to prove that it has no solutions for at least one prime factor of every n. Each integer n > 2 is divisible by 4 or by an odd prime number (or both). Therefore, Fermat's Last Theorem could be proved for all n if it could be proved for n = 4 and for all odd primes p.
For example, if a = 2 and p = 7, then 2 7 = 128, and 128 − 2 = 126 = 7 × 18 is an integer multiple of 7. If a is not divisible by p, that is, if a is coprime to p, then Fermat's little theorem is equivalent to the statement that a p − 1 − 1 is an integer multiple of p, or in symbols: [1] [2] ().
If 2 k + 1 is prime and k > 0, then k itself must be a power of 2, [1] so 2 k + 1 is a Fermat number; such primes are called Fermat primes. As of 2023 [update] , the only known Fermat primes are F 0 = 3 , F 1 = 5 , F 2 = 17 , F 3 = 257 , and F 4 = 65537 (sequence A019434 in the OEIS ).
[2] [3] The statement that every prime p of the form + is the sum of two squares is sometimes called Girard's theorem. [4] For his part, Fermat wrote an elaborate version of the statement (in which he also gave the number of possible expressions of the powers of p as a sum of two squares) in a letter to Marin Mersenne dated December 25, 1640 ...
(u + v) 2 = w 2 + 4s 2 and (u − v) 2 = w 2 − 4s 2. Multiplying these equations together yields (u 2 − v 2) 2 = w 4 − 16s 4. But as Fermat proved, there can be no integer solution to the equation x 4 − y 4 = z 2, of which this is a special case with z = u 2 − v 2, x = w and y = 2s. The first step of Fermat's proof is to factor the ...
In mathematics, the interior extremum theorem, also known as Fermat's theorem, is a theorem which states that at the local extrema of a differentiable function, its derivative is always zero. It belongs to the mathematical field of real analysis and is named after French mathematician Pierre de Fermat .