Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If f is a Schwartz function, then τ x f is the convolution with a translated Dirac delta function τ x f = f ∗ τ x δ. So translation invariance of the convolution of Schwartz functions is a consequence of the associativity of convolution. Furthermore, under certain conditions, convolution is the most general translation invariant operation.
Animation of how cross-correlation is calculated. The left graph shows a green function G that is phase-shifted relative to function F by a time displacement of 𝜏. The middle graph shows the function F and the phase-shifted G represented together as a Lissajous curve. Integrating F multiplied by the phase-shifted G produces the right graph ...
Two intersecting lines. In Euclidean geometry, the intersection of a line and a line can be the empty set, a point, or another line. Distinguishing these cases and finding the intersection have uses, for example, in computer graphics, motion planning, and collision detection.
The probability distribution of the sum of two or more independent random variables is the convolution of their individual distributions. The term is motivated by the fact that the probability mass function or probability density function of a sum of independent random variables is the convolution of their corresponding probability mass functions or probability density functions respectively.
Young's inequality has an elementary proof with the non-optimal constant 1. [4]We assume that the functions ,,: are nonnegative and integrable, where is a unimodular group endowed with a bi-invariant Haar measure .
When the group is, say, cyclic abelian of finite order n, then the group algebra consists of finite sequences of length n and you get the "discrete circular convolution." Real line, same thing, you have L^1 functions. The convolution is defined the same way for any locally compact abelian group and the Fourier analysis goes through just the same.
Spoilers ahead! We've warned you. We mean it. Read no further until you really want some clues or you've completely given up and want the answers ASAP. Get ready for all of today's NYT ...
The theorem is still valid in a Banach algebra (see first line of the following proof). It is not sufficient for both series to be convergent; if both sequences are conditionally convergent, the Cauchy product does not have to converge towards the product of the two series, as the following example shows: