enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Myhill–Nerode theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myhill–Nerode_theorem

    Given a language , and a pair of strings and , define a distinguishing extension to be a string such that exactly one of the two strings and belongs to . Define a relation ∼ L {\displaystyle \sim _{L}} on strings as x ∼ L y {\displaystyle x\;\sim _{L}\ y} if there is no distinguishing extension for x {\displaystyle x} and y {\displaystyle y} .

  3. Type conversion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_conversion

    Existing Eiffel software uses the string classes (such as STRING_8) from the Eiffel libraries, but Eiffel software written for .NET must use the .NET string class (System.String) in many cases, for example when calling .NET methods which expect items of the .NET type to be passed as arguments. So, the conversion of these types back and forth ...

  4. Equivalence (formal languages) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_(formal_languages)

    In formal language theory, weak equivalence of two grammars means they generate the same set of strings, i.e. that the formal language they generate is the same. In compiler theory the notion is distinguished from strong (or structural) equivalence, which additionally means that the two parse trees [clarification needed] are reasonably similar in that the same semantic interpretation can be ...

  5. Type system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_system

    The process of verifying and enforcing the constraints of types—type checking—may occur at compile time (a static check) or at run-time (a dynamic check). If a language specification requires its typing rules strongly, more or less allowing only those automatic type conversions that do not lose information, one can refer to the process as strongly typed; if not, as weakly typed.

  6. Comparison of programming languages by type system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    This is a comparison of the features of the type systems and type checking of multiple programming languages.. Brief definitions A nominal type system means that the language decides whether types are compatible and/or equivalent based on explicit declarations and names.

  7. Trace monoid - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trace_monoid

    Let denote the free monoid on a set of generators , that is, the set of all strings written in the alphabet .The asterisk is a standard notation for the Kleene star.An independency relation on the alphabet then induces a symmetric binary relation on the set of strings : two strings , are related, , if and only if there exist ,, and a pair (,) such that = and =.

  8. Canonicalization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonicalization

    For instance in Unix-like systems, the string "/./" can be replaced by "/". In the C standard library , the function realpath() performs this task. Other operations performed by this function to canonicalize filenames are the handling of /.. components referring to parent directories, simplification of sequences of multiple slashes, removal of ...

  9. Comparison of programming languages (string functions)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    For function that manipulate strings, modern object-oriented languages, like C# and Java have immutable strings and return a copy (in newly allocated dynamic memory), while others, like C manipulate the original string unless the programmer copies data to a new string.