Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
After the Texas Instruments example, IBM was another company who used the same technique in the 1990s to monetize its own patents to make more than $1 billion annually in revenue. [ 1 ] Also in the 1990s, mainframe computer manufacturer Unisys and minicomputer manufacturer Wang turned to patent monetization in the face of declining product ...
The majority of these cases are filed by the companies that created the patented invention. But a growing share of the lawsuits [6] is coming from non-practicing entities (NPEs) – also called patent trolls – which acquire patents for the sole purpose of licensing and asserting their patent rights. In fact, NPE litigation grew from 2.6 ...
A royalty fund (also known as royalty funding) is a category of private equity fund that specializes in purchasing consistent revenue streams deriving from the payment of royalties. [ citation needed ] Royalties are a usage-based payment from one individual or entity to another individual or entity, giving the right to use an asset , product ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The promise of a F/RAND royalty address that problem: the patent holder will typically agree to contribute its technology to the standard, thus forgoing the exclusive use or the exclusive licensing of its technology, in exchange for the assurance that it will receive adequate compensation in reasonable royalties.
A 4% royalty on sales value for a 5-year period of the license, together with a lump-sum payment of $32000 (risk-free income) on execution of the license is then the 'asking price' in the example. The TTF of this projection is 2.6, implying that for every dollar of royalty paid, the OP to the licensee enterprise is multiplied by this factor.
The company has been described as the country's largest and most notorious patent trolling company, [2] the ultimate patent troll, [3] and the most hated company in tech. [4] In 2009, the firm launched a prototyping and research laboratory, Intellectual Ventures Lab , [ 5 ] which attracted media controversy when the book SuperFreakonomics ...
The MPEG-2 license agreement stated that MPEG-2 royalties must be paid when there is one or more active patents in either the country of manufacture or the country of sale. [32] The original MPEG-2 license rate was US$4 for a decoding license, US$4 for an encoding license and US$6.00 for encode-decode consumer product. [33]