enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ybarra v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ybarra_v._Illinois

    On March 1, 1976, an agent of the Illinois Bureau of Investigation, working in Aurora, requested a search warrant to search the Aurora Tap Tavern and its bartender for evidence of heroin trafficking, after an informant, "on the weekend" of February 28–29, observed 15 to 25 packets of tinfoil on the person of a bartender only known as "Greg," along with seeing the packets on him and in a ...

  3. Illinois v. Wardlow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Wardlow

    Illinois v. Wardlow , 528 U.S. 119 (2000), is a case decided before the United States Supreme Court involving U.S. criminal procedure regarding searches and seizures . Background

  4. Illinois v. Gates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Gates

    In Illinois v. Gates, probable cause was achieved for the warrant under the new "totality-of-the-circumstances" standard because the investigation by DEA and Detective Mader would have, on its own, been probable cause for a search warrant. [citation needed] The Gates' actions were suspicious because Florida is a known source of illegal drugs ...

  5. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be ...

  6. Soldal v. Cook County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldal_v._Cook_County

    Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a seizure of property like that which occurs during an eviction, even absent a search or an arrest, implicates the Fourth Amendment.

  7. Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest ...

    www.aol.com/news/police-cannot-seize-property...

    The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to the length of a seizure, a federal court ruled last week, significantly restricting how long law enforcement ...

  8. Illinois v. McArthur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._McArthur

    Illinois v. McArthur , 531 U.S. 326 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned the extent of the government's power to limit an individual's complete control of his or her home pending the arrival of a search warrant.

  9. Illinois v. Lidster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Lidster

    Illinois v. Lidster , 540 U.S. 419 (2004), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Fourth Amendment permits the police to use a roadblock to investigate a traffic incident.