enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Suburban New York police agency made illegal arrests, strip ...

    www.aol.com/suburban-york-police-agency-made...

    A suburban New York police department regularly violated civil rights by making illegal arrests and conducting illegal strip and cavity searches, the Department of Justice said in a new report ...

  3. A suburban police force in New York strip searched nearly ...

    www.aol.com/suburban-police-force-york-strip...

    A suburban New York police department routinely violated residents’ civil rights, including making illegal arrests and using unnecessary strip and cavity searches, according to a new U.S ...

  4. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be ...

  5. Across Kansas, police conduct illegal search and seizures ...

    www.aol.com/across-kansas-police-conduct-illegal...

    Sheriff’s deputies and a police detective stood on the other side, carrying a search warrant. The 27-year-old let the officers inside the ranch-style house near Emporia State University.

  6. Searches incident to a lawful arrest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searches_incident_to_a...

    Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.

  7. Kentucky v. King - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_v._King

    Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452 (2011), was a decision by the US Supreme Court, which held that warrantless searches conducted in police-created exigent circumstances do not violate the Fourth Amendment as long as the police did not create the exigency by violating or threatening to violate the Fourth Amendment.

  8. Even when a police search is illegal, prosecutors may still ...

    www.aol.com/even-police-search-illegal...

    The exception in some instances allows for the introduction of evidence gathered during illegal searches, so long as a judge approved a search warrant, even if the warrant shouldn’t have been ...

  9. Rodriguez v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodriguez_v._United_States

    Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case which analyzed whether police officers may extend the length of a traffic stop to conduct a search with a trained detection dog. [1]