enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: third party petition forfeiture

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the...

    Government must prove that third-party owners knew about criminal activity connected to their property. [52] 50% directly to law enforcement, 25% to law enforcement community services fund, 25% to drug rehabilitation programs. [52] Connecticut "A person" needs to be convicted in cases involving drugs, identity theft, and sex trafficking.

  3. Asset freezing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_freezing

    the appointment of a provisional liquidator (where the applicant is likely to obtain a winding-up order on the hearing of the petition). A "third party debt order" (which consists of an interim freezing order and a final order requiring the third party to pay the debt to the judgment creditor) is available to secure payment of County Court ...

  4. Asset forfeiture - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_forfeiture

    [citation needed] In civil forfeiture cases, the US government sues the item of property, not the person; the owner is effectively a third-party claimant. The burden is on the government to establish that the property is subject to forfeiture by a preponderance of the evidence. If it is successful, the owner may yet prevail by establishing an ...

  5. Right to petition in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition_in_the...

    The 1688 Bill of Rights provides no such limitation to assembly. Under the common law, the right of an individual to petition implies the right of multiple individuals to assemble lawfully for that purpose. [11] England's implied right to assemble to petition was made an express right in the US First Amendment.

  6. In rem jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_rem_jurisdiction

    United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs, an obscenity forfeiture case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1971. United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film, a case very similar to the above heard by the Supreme Court two years later. Nebraska v. One 1970 2-Door Sedan Rambler (Gremlin) United States v.

  7. Impleader - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impleader

    Rule 14(a)(5): A third-party defendant may engage in third-party practice of his own. Rule 14(a)(6): Special rules regarding maritime or admiralty jurisdiction. Rule 14(b): When a claim is asserted against a plaintiff, he may engage in third-party practice of his own. Rule 14(c): Special rules regarding maritime or admiralty jurisdiction.

  8. Which US companies are pulling back on diversity initiatives?

    www.aol.com/us-companies-pulling-back-diversity...

    A number of prominent companies have scaled back or set aside the diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives that much of corporate America endorsed following the protests that accompanied the ...

  9. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    Rule 8(d) maintains that each allegation be "simple, concise, and direct" but allows "2 or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically." If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is sufficient. A party may state inconsistent (even mutually exclusive) claims or defenses.

  1. Ad

    related to: third party petition forfeiture