enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: kjv vs nkjv

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament...

    The KJV has 23 verses in chapter 14 and 33 verses in chapter 15 of Romans. Most translations follow KJV (based on Textus Receptus) versification and have Romans 16:25–27 and Romans 14:24–26 do not exist. The WEB bible, however, moves Romans 16:25–27 (end of chapter verses) to Romans 14:24–26 (also end of chapter verses).

  3. New King James Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_King_James_Version

    The New King James Version (NKJV) is a translation of the Bible in contemporary English. Published by Thomas Nelson, the complete NKJV was released in 1982.With regard to its textual basis, the NKJV relies on a modern critical edition (the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia) for the Old Testament, [1] while opting to use the Textus Receptus for the New Testament.

  4. Modern English Bible translations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_English_Bible...

    Webster's Revision of the King James Version: 1833 (Johannes Lauritzen) 1920 CKJV: Children's King James Version Jay P. Green: 1960 KJ II: King James II Version of the Bible Jay P. Green: 1971 KJ3/LITV: King James 3 Version of the Holy Bible (by Jay P. Green) 1985 KJV20: King James Version—Twentieth Century Edition Jay P. Green: NKJV: New ...

  5. 21st Century King James Version - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../21st_Century_King_James_Version

    Unlike the New King James Version, the 21st Century King James Version does not alter the language significantly from the King James Version. [3] The author has eliminated "obsolete words". [3] The changes in words are based on the second edition of the Webster's New International Dictionary. [3] There were no changes related to gender or theology.

  6. Textus Receptus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_Receptus

    The translators of the King James Version did not rely on a single edition of the Textus receptus but instead they incorporated readings from multiple editions of the Textus receptus, including those by Erasmus, Stephanus, and Beza. Additionally, they consulted the Complutensian Polyglot and the Latin Vulgate itself.

  7. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

    The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...

  8. List of English Bible translations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_Bible...

    New King James Version: NKJV Modern English 1982 Masoretic Text (Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, 1983), Textus Receptus Protestant, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox New Life Version: NLV Modern English 1986 New Living Translation: NLT Modern English 1996 (revisions in 2004, 2007, 2013, and 2015) Evangelical, Protestant, Roman Catholic (Version)

  9. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

    The English King James Version or "Authorized Version", published in 1611, has been one of the most debated English versions. Many supporters of the King James Version are disappointed with the departure from this translation to newer translations that use the critical text instead of the Byzantine text as

  1. Ad

    related to: kjv vs nkjv