enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bostic v. Schaefer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostic_v._Schaefer

    The suit was filed by attorneys Robert Ruloff, Thomas Shuttleworth, Charles Lustig, Andrew M. Hendrick, and Erik Porcaro on behalf of Tim Bostic and Tony London. It named Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell as the principal defendant. [2] After McDonnell left office in January 2014, the case was restyled as Bostic v.

  3. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    Causation is typically a bigger issue in negligence cases than intentional torts. However, as mentioned previously, it is an element of any tort. The defendant's act must be an actual cause and a proximate cause of the result in a particular cause of action.

  4. McDonnell v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_v._United_States

    Virginia has been a tobacco-producing state. The governor held events promoting the company's product at his governor's mansion after receiving gifts from the CEO of the company. At the trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, prosecutors charged Robert F. McDonnell and his wife with quid pro quo. The jury ...

  5. Res ipsa loquitur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_ipsa_loquitur

    Res ipsa loquitur (Latin: "the thing speaks for itself") is a doctrine in common law and Roman-Dutch law jurisdictions under which a court can infer negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved in the context of tort litigation.

  6. Bailey v Ministry of Defence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailey_v_Ministry_of_Defence

    The case received some quick comment. Sarah Green was supportive of the outcome for correcting some old mistakes. She wrote, The exceptional approach to the causal inquiry which derives from McGhee and Fairchild does not apply to the Wardlaw/Bailey situation because there was in the former cases a need to modify the “but for” test because no “but for” causation could otherwise be ...

  7. Loss of chance in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_of_chance_in_English_law

    In English law, loss of chance refers to a particular problem of causation, which arises in tort and contract. The law is invited to assess hypothetical outcomes, either affecting the claimant or a third party, where the defendant's breach of contract or of the duty of care for the purposes of negligence deprived the claimant of the opportunity to obtain a benefit and/or avoid a loss.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case Year Decided Holding Voting Dred Scott v. Sandford: 1857: Held that people of African ancestry (whether free or not) were not United States Citizens, and therefore lacked standing to sue. This ruling stood as precedent until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 7–2 Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co ...