Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Morningstar Rating for Funds is a rating system for investment funds operated by Morningstar. The Star Rating, debuted in 1985, a year after Morningstar was founded. The 1- to 5-star system, "looks at a fund's risk-adjusted return based on its performance over three, five and 10 years and on its volatility. The highest rating of five stars ...
The Morningstar Analyst Rating debuted in 2011 as a qualitative rating assigned by Morningstar's team of manager research analysts for funds under their coverage. This forward-looking metric is analyst-driven, and is considered an aptitude test of a fund manager's capabilities in a specific strategy. [ 1 ]
Issues driving Morningstar / Sustainalytics ESG Risk Ratings [22] Category Issue Contribution to ESG Risk Rating Environmental 43.3% Carbon - Own Operations 19.2% Resource Use 10.3% Emissions, Effluents and Waste 7.1% Environmental and Social Impact of Products and Services 6.7% Social 34.1% Human Rights 22.8% Occupational Health and Safety 7.5%
The Morningstar Rating for Stocks debuted in 2001 and was initially applied to 500 stocks. [1] [2] The stock-rating system compares a stock's current market price with Morningstar's estimate of the stock's fair value. [3] Like the Morningstar Rating for Funds, the rating is applied in the form of stars. [4]
The Brinson-Fachler methodology underpins many public performance attribution analyses. Morningstar, for example, includes a whitepaper [9] on their mode of employing the Brinson-Fachler methodology. Morningstar is known for its analysis of long-only mutual funds, but the Brinson-Fachler analysis is also applicable to hedge ranking funds. [10]
Administration can refer to the bureaucratic or operational performance of routine office tasks, [3] usually internally oriented and reactive rather than proactive. Administrators, broadly speaking, engage in a common set of functions to meet an organization's goals.
Active investors have many goals. Many active investors are seeking a higher return. Other goals of active management can be managing risk, minimizing taxes, increasing dividend or interest income, or achieving non-financial goals, such as advancing social or environmental causes. [3]
Goals-Based Investing or Goal-Driven Investing (sometimes abbreviated GBI) is the use of financial markets to fund goals within a specified period of time. Traditional portfolio construction balances expected portfolio variance with return and uses a risk aversion metric to select the optimal mix of investments. By contrast, GBI optimizes an ...